238x Filetype PPT File size 0.16 MB Source: digitalpreservation.gov
Question 2
• 2. What hardware technology are you least concerned
about for preservation archives in terms of reliability of
the bits, and why.
> Tape
> Most of the digital archive data is on tape -> good track record.
> There are still some customers with 3420s and 4480s out there, technology 20- 30 yrs
old
> Many independent studies done to predict archive life
– 10 - 100 years
– Manufacturers typically recommend 30 years maximum
– Possible failure mechanisms
● Particle corrosion
● Binder and substrate aging
● Magnetic thermal stability
> Consider technology refresh every 8 to11 years due to equipment obsolescence
– Tape has high data rate for more efficient media conversion to next technology
– Virtual tape solutions can help in migration to new technologies
2
Question 3
• 3. What hardware technology being developed in 1, 2, or 5
years would either increase or reduce the concern about the
reliability of the bits (defined as: the bits "in" will be the same
as the bits "out") and why.
> Holographic storage would increase the concern about data archive
reliability because it is new and unknown.
– Difficult technical problems -> Long 40 year development history with no
major commercial products yet.
– Promising archive life but no field history on media archival reliability, so
real failure mechanisms are unknown.
– Is roadmap compelling enough when compared to current archive
technologies? Will it really become mainstream or just niche market?
3
Discussion Topics
• 1. What hardware standards and/or hardware technologies can
now apply (and will apply in the near future) to digital preservation
in terms of: Magnetic Tape
> a. Costs of long-term storage, including media and facilities Tape Media
is lowest cost GB technology suitable for archive. Need to include floor
space and environmental control costs for long term storage.
> b. Reliabilty of media and other components Long history of reliable use
> c. Migration to new technologies Fast data rate for more efficent
migration
> d. Security Encryption available
• 2. What hardware technologies if any have the potential in the 2012
timeframe to change current methods and techniques of digital
preservation? Unknown
• 3. What is the one thing that would be most useful to get from
software that could support the items in Topic #1? Background
migration to newer technologies every 8-11 years
4
Access vs Power /CO2
Access Time and Energy (1PByte of Data for 1yr)
1,000,000
100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
Access Time to Data (Sec)
1
1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000
Energy Needed for Storage (lbs ofCO 2)
5
What about throughput?
Storage System Power Efficiency - Tape Library, MAID, RAID
1400
1200 GOODNESS
1000
TAPE SYSTEMS
800
600
400
CAPACITY (TB/KW)
200
DISK SYSTEMS
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
THROUGHPUT (TB/HR/KW)
6
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.