235x Filetype PDF File size 0.31 MB Source: www.cmcwtrl.in
13urus Vul. 23, No. 6, pp. 517-514, 1997
D 1997 Ekevier Sciellce Ltd for 1331. AI rights reserved
Printed in Great Britain
0305-ami 517.00 T 0.00
ELSEVIER
PI!: §0305-4~79(97)00030-2
Hospital-made diet versus commercial supplement
in postburn nutritional support
Frema Dhanraj, Ashok Chacko, Mary Mammen and Ravindra Bharathi
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Christian Medical College and Hospital, VeLlore 632 004,
Tamil Nadu, Tndia
Therfore nutritional support is as important as any
Nutritional sqort is mz imporfant aspect of the mamgenrent o,f other aspect of burns management. Nutritional
burl7 ptif37fs. ,xLftritioil quple~~zenfation cm be ackie-Jed eithcv support following burns can be achieved by either
by ‘kospital-Fmde i;Y ‘commercial diets. Carnmevcial diets are enteral or parenteral routes. Parenteral nutrition is
$icacicIks but cx,vensioc arld smetimes not easily available. This usually avoided because of its expense and the high
study was undevtaken to compare the #ic~zcy rind tolerance 0,f a rate of complications. Enteral nutrition can be given
hos@i-made diet with a commercial diet. Twenty patients ivith by either ‘hospital-made’ or ‘commercial’ diets.
harrzs ranging l’wn 20-50 per cent TBSA were s&died to Although commercial diets are efficacious they are
conzynrr~ the efficacy and tolerance of the ‘hospital-made’ diet with expensive and sometimes not easily available.
‘cowmcrinl’ pmparatiorzs. Patients -were divided into two groups Hospital-made diets are cheap and the ingredients
o/ IO each and randomised WifhipZ each group to yecceiz>e eifhcr a from which the diet is made are easily available.
hosyital-made diet (j?vc patiellts) 07 a comnzevcial diet !fisIe However, the tolerance and efficacv of ‘hospital-
patients). E~ficncy 0J’ diet was assessed by coaluntion of m&i- made’ diets compared to ‘commerciai’ diets are not
iio~xd stnflls, gqft hdaz, number 0-f silrgicd p~oceduws Ned known.
dzwation of iras@aZ stay. Tolemnce was assessed by recovdillg Therefore, the aims of the present study were to
jidc @is suciz LIS ~aawza, mnitiq, abdomi~ad distclzfion and compare the tolerance and efficacy of ‘hospital-made’
:iiaruhwa. Bath diets mm well tolerated by all pntients. There diets with ‘commercial’ diets.
was no signi,Ficunt diffemce in imiuitional sfatlks, wn~ber of
suugicai proccdum, ~wcenfage of graft take and duration qf Method
hospital stay 017 eitkev diet, suggesting that kos@al-made diets Subjects
UYF similar in efficacy al7d fo~eravrce but cheaper UFld more easily Twenty patients with flame burns ranging between
mailable. They are a good alternative to ‘commercial’ diets, 211 and 50 per cent body surface area, admitted to the
especiai!y irz pow patients. 0 1997 Eiseuiev Sciem Lfd fur ISBI. Burn Unit of the Christian Medical College Hospital
Kepords: Burns, enteral nutrition, hospital-made diet. (CMC), Vellore were studied. There were 11 males
and 9 females and their ages ranged from 17 to 50 yr.
Patients with diabetes mellitus, psychosis, renal
Burns, VOL. 23, .Vo. 6, 512-514, 1997 failure and those admitted 3 days after the burn were
excluded.
Patients were divided into two groups depending
Introduction on extent of burn injury. Group I (10 patients) had
2&35 per cent burns while Group II (10 patients)
After burn injury, patients enter a severe catabolic had 36-50 per cent burns. Patients in each group
state characterised by elevated metabohc rate, were randomised to receive either ‘hospital-made’
ancreased protein mobilisation and gluconeogenesis. (five patients) or ‘commercial’ diets (five patients).
In burned patients these catabolic changes lead to
significant increases in energy and protein require- Diets
ments’. Weig.ht loss during this phase is virtually The composition of the ‘hospital-made’ and ‘commer-
inevitable unless aggressive nutritional therapy is cial’ diets were similar (T&le I). Both diets were
instituted soon after the burn. Weight loss of more prmepared in the dietary department, appeared similar
than 10 per cent has been shown to increase and were packed in similar bottles. The diets were
mortality and a weight loss of more than 30 per cent prepared twice a day and were stored in the ward’s
is associated with almost 100 per cent mortality’. refrigerator prior to use.
Dhanraj et al.: Postburn nutritional support 513
Table I. Compiticm of ‘hospital-made’ iliFt per 15011 ml
Amount (g) CHO k/l Protein (g) Fat (gl Calories (Kcals)
Hospital made
Cottage cheese 375 2.1 32.0 36.4 464
Eggs (Nos) 3 19.8 19.8 255
Malted ragi * 20 15.9 1.2 0.2 70
Ragi flour 80 63.6 5.0 1.0 280
Sugar 55 55.0 220
Refined Oil 25 - 25.0 225
Total 136.6 58.0 82.4 1514
Commercial 132.1 57.3 83.6 1515
*Ragi is a millet (Eleusine coracana).
Feeding regimen once a week. Total protein, albumin, serum trans-
Tlw cahric requirement for each patient was ferrin and total lymphocyte count were measured at
estimated using the Curreri formula’. Diets were fed admission and repeated after 2 weeks and at
as continuous infusions over 24 h. All patients were discharge.
fed buttermilk on the first postburn day at 50 ml/h Standard burn management was carried out on all
through a I4 Fr size nasogastric tube. The tip of the patients. Fluid resuscitation was performed according
tube was positioned in the antrum of the stomach. to a modified Brooke formula’. Cultures of urine,
Aspiration was performed every 4 h to exclude reten- blood and intravenous catheter tips were taken when
tion. Half strength burn formula diet (BFD), at the necessary and appropriate antibiotics administered
rate of 50 ml/h, was started on second postburn day depending on the culture and sensitivity reports.
and increased to 100 ml/h on third postburn day. Full Wounds were dressed with silver sulfadiazine and
strength burn formula diet at the rate of 100 ml/h eschar debrided in the ward. Patients were taken for
was given from the fourth day and increased by skin grafting when granulation was healthy. Early
SO ml/h per day until the full caloric requirement was excision was not performed.
reached. Patients wt’re allowed to eat solid food from The efficacy of the burn formula feeds were
day 111. The daily intake of energy and protein from assessed by improvement in nutritional status, graft
solid food were calculated by a dietitian and appro- take, number of surgical procedures required and
priate reduct.ion of BFD was made according to the duration of stay. The study protocol was approved
amount ot solid food consumed’. Both groups of by the Research Committee of the Christian Medical
patients were on bed rest with minimal activity, such College, Vellore.
as walking in the room and mild exercises to prevent
contractures. Statistical method
Tolerance of diet was assessed by recording side- Comparison of study parameters between two diets
effects for 12xample nausea, vomiting, abdominal was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
distension and diarrhoeas. If patients complained of Data were analysed using SPSS PC+ software.
any of the above, the volume of the feed was
reduced anJ increased gradually to the calculated Results
requirement.
Ihhlc II shows that age, sex, per cent surface area of
Nutritional status evaluation and burn burn, weight at admission and energy and protein
management intake were similar in patients fed with ‘hospital-
made’ and ‘commercial’ diets in the two groups
Cljnical and biochemical parameters were used to studied. Hospital-made and commercial feeds were
evaluate nutritional status. Patients were weighed well tolerated by all patients in the study with no
Table II. Patient char
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.