335x Filetype PDF File size 0.16 MB Source: ijsw.tiss.edu
Lina Kashyap Marriage Counselling
Marriage Counselling
LINA KASHYAP
This article first provides a feminist understanding of the marriage scenario in India
and the sociocultural nature of problems faced by Indian couples using the ecological
systems and power relations frameworks. It then describes an empowerment
based-practice, which is built on a synthesis of structural and individual perspectives
which includes couple counselling for relationship and psychosexual difficulties,
interventions with the third force and interventions with couples and their children. The
article also contains a lesson plan on this topic and includes learner objectives,
session plan, teaching and assessment methodologies.
Prof. Lina Kashyap is Deputy Director, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai.
I
INTRODUCTION
-
Marriage counselling, like other family-centred interventions, has to be em
-
bedded in the sociocultural, economic and political milieu in which it is of
fered. In the Western conception of marriage, it is assumed that the marital
-
partners are adult independent persons who hold clear-cut roles in the mar
riage,haveacoupleidentity,andthefamilyunitislargelynuclearinstructure.
Marital conflict is viewed as a manifestation of pathology among its partners
(Strean, 1985) or as a result of dysfunctional communication (Satir,1983).
TheemphasisinmarriagecounsellingintheWestismoreintheareasofmate
selection, communication and decision making in marriage, handling sexual
problems, and working out parenting as a joint responsibility.
Therealities in the Indian situation are very different. In India, marriage
takes place between two families rather than two individuals. The partners
are often very young in age and/or emotionally immature. The family unit is
extendedinspirit if not in composition and this has a major influence on the
quality of the marital relationship. Additionally, in the Indian situation, very
often, the marital conflict between the couple is instigated and complicated
by a third party’s involvement in the relationship, which is generally more
destructive rather than facilitative. The influence of this ‘Third Force’ has to
be taken cognisance of and dealt with in marriage counselling.
254 Lina Kashyap
Therefore, to begin with, marriage counselling in India has to be based
onanunderstandingofthesocialconstructionofmarriageinIndiansociety
andthestatusandrolesofthemaritalsub-systemwithinthefamilysystem
as these have implications for the couple’s adjustment to each other and to
the family system. Marriage counselling in India has also to be wider in
scope and has to take a holistic approach. Firstly, the marital relationship
cannotbetreatedasaunitoutsidethefamilyandcommunitysystems.Sec-
ondly,marriagecounsellinginIndiahastotakecognisanceofthesystemic
nature of difficulties faced by the couple, the power equations between the
maritaldyadandtheroleofpatriarchyincouplerelations.Thirdly,ithasto
recognisethepossibleadverseinfluenceofthethirdforceonthecouplere
-
lationship.
MARRIAGE,MARITALADJUSTMENTANDMARITALDISCORD
IN THEINDIANCONTEXT
Aconceptual understanding of the marriage scenario is sought to be pro-
vided through the ‘Pinch-Crunch Model’ (Figure 1) adapted by the author
from RELATE(UK).Thediscussion of the various aspects of the figure is
substantiated by a review of relevant research studies and through a critical
analysisofthesystemicnatureofcoupledifficultiesandthepowerdynamics
within the couple relationship using the feminist perspective.
As shown in Figure 1, most Indian marriages are arranged by parents
and members of the kinship group with religion, class and caste positions
being important considerations. Today, although patterns of partner selec-
tionvaryintermsoftheextentofchoicegiventotheyoungmanorwoman,
family approval is still essential for the marriage to take place. A marriage
is expected to fulfil the patriarchal family’s needs and ensure family cohe-
sion which takes precedence over individual compatibility and individual
fulfilment. In present day marriages, the relationship is more congenial in
nature. Nevertheless, young couples today are grappling with balancing
traditional beliefs and practices with modern concepts and values.
-
Most couples in India start their married life in the house of the hus
band’s parents. As most marriages are arranged, the couple has to move
from commitment to the marriage to commitment to the marital relation-
ship. This also means that the couple has to shift their primary relationship
from parents or family of orientation to their marital relationship. Each
partner brings into their marriage their conceptual image about their ideal
partner, expectations from the marriage, expectations from each other, as
Marriage Counselling 255
wellasexpectationstheirpartner’sfamilyoforientation(BhattiandJuvva,
1997). In fact, the spouses have to learn to strike a balance between the
marital unit and relations with the parental unit. In the process, the couple
has to negotiate expectations, roles and patterns of behaviour not only be-
tween themselves, but also individually and together with both the family
units. The nature of expectations varies according to the educational back-
ground and socioeconomic status of the partners. Similarly, expectations
from marriage and the partner’s family of orientation also vary as per the
educational achievement and the socioeconomic status of the spouses. But
such expectations are always there in each and every marriage by every
partner in all strata of society (Bhatti, 2003).
In India, the marital partners are influenced by gender-based tradi-
tional values and norms in their perception and practice of marital roles.
These roles are culturally bound, but shaped by the individual family to
someextent, in accordance to its socioeconomic status. Each spouse has
two sets of roles towards both families — the family of orientation and
the family of procreation. These sets of role expectations from both these
families influence the spouses even when they are away from the family
of orientation. In the patriarchal family system, the carrying over of the
culture of the husband’s family of orientation is primary, but not that of
thewife.Amanaftermarriagemaycontinuetoplayrolesexpectedbyhis
family of orientation but it is not culturally accepted if the wife plays
roles expected by her family of orientation, once she is married. More-
overthewifeisexpectedtoadheretothetraditionalstandardsofhermar-
ital family, rejecting those of her familyoforientation(Channabasavanna
and Bhatti, 1985).
-
In the patrilocal family system, it is the new bride who enters the hus
band’sfamilyasanewmember.She,therefore,hastomakeadjustmentsto
meettheneedsandexpectationsofnotonlyherspousebutalsothoseofhis
relatives. Her status is clearly viewed as inferior and subordinate to that of
her husband. One of the basic realities of Indian marriages is the unequal
status roles of the spouses in marriage and the relative importance of the
-
twofamiliesoforientation.Thesystemofmarriage,themannerofnegotia
-
tion, the paymentofdowryandtheritesofmarriage,setsthesealonthein
equality of marital relations. Ramu (1988) and Jain and Dave (1982), who
studied roles and power in conjugal relationships. have noted that majority
of husbands wanted to be seen as decision makers and wives helped them
to maintain such an image.
256 Lina Kashyap
Research studies have indicated the following factors as influencing
maritaladjustment:personalitycharacteristics,sexualrelationships,extent
of verbal communication between the spouses, and certain demographic
characteristics such as age difference between the spouses, their educa-
tional level, occupation, women’s employment, socioeconomic back-
ground,andnumberofchildren(Bhattacharya,2000;Bhatti,2003;Kapur,
1972;KumarandRohatgi,1986;MohanandSingh,1985;Srivastav,Singh
and Nigam, 1988).
AsseeninFigure1,ifthecoupleisabletocopewiththestressbrought
onbyvariouskindsofadjustmentstheyhavetomake,theyarethenableto
achievesomestabilityintherelationshipandareabletocommitnotonlyto
the marriage but also to the relationship. However, if the couple is not able
tocopewiththeadjustments,theyexperiencethe‘pinch’leadingtomarital
discord.
SomeoftheproblemsinmarriagefacedbyIndiancouplesaresimilarto
those faced by couples anywhere in the world, such as alcoholism or drug
abuse by spouse, infidelity, desertion, verbal, physical or sexual abuse of
spouse and sexual incompatibility. However, some of the distinctive fac-
tors that impinge on Indian marriages are more socioculturally based and
linked to expectations from the partner’s family of procreation, such as
childlessness or no sons (Chaudhary, 1988; Kawale, 1985; Pothen, 1986);
dowry demands by in-laws (Bhattacharya, 2000; Ghadially and Kumar,
1988; Parihar, 1990); and interference by immediate and extended family
memberswhoexertpowerandcontroloverthecoupleasaunitorindividu-
ally on the husband or wife in a manner which is destructive to the marital
relationship (Bhat and Surti, 1979; Ghadially and Kumar, 1988; Kashyap,
2000).
Traditionally, appropriate ways of handling marital relationships and
problems were undertaken by elders in the family, doctors, lawyers and
priests. Compromise, adjustment, family honour were the key words used
which were basically aimed at maintaining and strengthening the family
bond through the maintenance of the dominance–submissive relationship
withinthecoupledyad.Insuchsituations,thecoupleattemptedtoreturnto
the earlier status quo and some renegotiation of expectations and roles.
Given the unequal status roles of the spouses in marriage, it is usually the
-
less powerful one, the wife, who is required to make the adjustments re
quiredtopreservetherelationship.Professionalcounsellingmaybesought
at this stage — almost as a last resort — when everybody has tried
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.