244x Filetype PDF File size 1.28 MB Source: files.eric.ed.gov
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 472 652 FL 027 593
AUTHOR Jordan, Sherilynn Nidever
TITLE Forensic Linguistics: The Linguistic Analyst and Expert
Witness of Language Evidence in Criminal Trials.
PUB DATE 2002-08-00
NOTE 159p.; A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of
Intercultural Studies, Department of TESOL and Applied
Linguistics, Biola University.
PUB TYPE Dissertations/Theses - Masters Theses (042) --
Speeches /Meeting Papers (150)
EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC07 Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS *Crime; *Criminal Law; Ethics; *Evidence (Legal); *Forensic
Sciences; *Linguistics
IDENTIFIERS Expert Witness; Forensic Psychology; Trials
ABSTRACT
Forensic linguistics (FL) provides consultation to lawyers
through the analysis of language evidence during the pre-trial investigation.
Evidence commonly analyzed by linguists in criminal cases includes
transcripts of police interviews and language crimes (such as bribery) and
anonymous or questioned texts. Forensic linguistic testimony is rarely
admitted into courts of law, however. A major reason for this is apparently
impressionistic methods, which are examined for their objectivity. A further
barrier to legal acceptance is that FL experts, like all experts testifying
in court, support the claims of whichever side has hired them. Nonetheless,
forensic linguists have an ethical and professional responsibility to provide
the legal community with reliable and admissible information and help prevent
unfair conviction or acquittal of criminal defendants. Legal acceptance of FL
expertise should increase as methods improve and as forensic linguists adapt
to legal norms. This thesis includes five parts: (1) "The Field of Forensic
Linguistics"; (2) "The Evidence Forensic Linguists Analyze"; (3) "The Need to
Improve Credibility in the Legal Community"; (4) "Professional and Ethical
Issues and Responsibilities for Forensic Linguists"; and (5) "The Future of
Forensic Linguistics." Anthrax letters are appenddd. (Contains 92
references.) (SM)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.
FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE LINGUISTIC ANALYST AND EXPERT
WITNESS OF LANGUAGE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
A Thesis
Presented to
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION the Faculty of the School of Intercultural Studies
Office of Educational Research and Improvement
ED ATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION
CENTER (ERIC) Department of TESOL and Applied Linguistics
This document has been reproduced as
received from the person or organization
originating it.
Minor changes have been made to Biola University
improve reproduction quality.
Points of view or opinions stated in this PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND
document do not necessarily represent DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
official OERI position or policy. BEEN GRANTED BY
In Partial Fulfillment
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
of the Requirements for the Degree 1
Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics
by
Sherilynn Nidever Jordan
August 2002
BST COPYMA1
6
ABSTRACT
FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE LINGUISTIC ANALYST AND EXPERT
WITNESS OF LANGUAGE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
Sherilynn Nidever Jordan
Forensic Linguistics provides consultation to lawyers through the
analysis of language evidence during the pre-trial investigation. Evidence
commonly analyzed by linguists in criminal cases includes transcripts of police
interviews and language crimes (such as bribery) and anonymous or
questioned texts. Forensic linguistic testimony is rarely admitted into courts of
law, however. A major reason for this is apparently impressionistic methods,
which are examined for their objectivity. A further barrier to legal acceptance is
that FL experts, like all experts testifying in court, support the claims of
whichever side has hired them. Nonetheless, forensic linguists have an ethical
and professional responsibility to provide as thorough and objective analyses
as possible in order to provide the legal community with reliable and admissible
information and help prevent unfair conviction or acquittal of criminal
defendants. Legal acceptance of FL expertise should increase as methods
improve and as forensic linguists adapt to legal norms.
FORENSIC LINGUISTICS: THE LINGUISTIC ANALYST AND EXPERT
WITNESS OF LANGUAGE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
BY
Sherilynn Nidever Jordan
APPROVED:
4/VLAk Plit4",dk_ s a1
Dr. Herbert C. Purnell
Chair, Thesis Committee
4f,
Dr. Stephen Baf6er
Member, Thesis Committee
Mr. Walter Lewis
Member, Thesis Committee
APPROVED:
v t,
Dr. F. Dougla Pennoyer Date
Dean, School of Intercultural Studies
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.